Thursday, March 27, 2008

Giving the Devil This Undo

Above all, I believe in fairness. If the Republican Party wasn't hell-bent on domination I would fight for fair. I'd walk out into the open, unarmed and earnestly work for our mutual benefit. Unfortunately, I know better.

Knowing that Dick Cheney's an asshole makes his comments and actions at least understandable. He's still a fuck for being an asshole, though.

Still, in all fairness, he's being mildly misquoted with his "So?" response to ABC reporter Martha Raddatz's comment that 2/3's of Americans don't feel the war is worth fighting.

I first saw this on the Daily Show. Then I received an email in which Michael Moore said this
... A reporter from ABC News this week told Dick Cheney, in regards to Iraq, "two-thirds of Americans say it's not worth fighting." Cheney cut her off with a one word answer: "So?"

"So?" As in, "So what?" As in, "F*** you. I could care less."

I would like every American to see Cheney flip the virtual bird at the them, the American people. Click here and pass it around. Then ask yourself why we haven't risen up and thrown him and his puppet out of the White House. ....


To Michael Moore's credit, he did link to a clip of the interview from Think Progress.
This is a vital point:Never Blindly Believe Anyone. Especially people you trust. We all make mistakes, but parroting someone else's mistake is dangerous.

I noticed something wrong with Think Progress' transcription, though
CHENEY: On the security front, I think there’s a general consensus that we’ve made major progress, that the surge has worked. That’s been a major success.

RADDATZ: Two-third of Americans say it’s not worth fighting.

CHENEY: So?

RADDATZ So? You don’t care what the American people think?

CHENEY: No. I think you cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the public opinion polls.
(Emphasis Think Progress's)


Cheney didn't say, "No [Period: End of Sentence] I think ... ," confirming Raddatz's statement. He said, "No [Comma: Continuing] I think ... ," correcting her. The devil will always be in the details. This time, the details support the Devil.

This was enough for me to write a post. And wanting to back up my words with proof - and neatly tying in with my new fascination with YouTube - I went there to grab a clip to embed.

I wanted context, too. I wanted to kill any claims of misrepresentation by showing what ABC showed, not the snippet Think Progress showed me. Now I noticed something else: The background noise jumped up and down and words sounded clipped. The clip was chopped to hell.

Editing is necessary. Only a tiny fraction of what anybody says or does is actually interesting. The Sound Recordist and Editor, though, both should be fired. The edit was a total hack job. See/hear for yourself.



And now here's what actually was said -
THE VICE PRESIDENT: ... It's hard to go into a country that has never experienced democracy and expect to be able to flip a switch and have it turn overnight. But it is turning. They do have a democracy today. They have basic --

Q: Two-thirds of Americans say it was not worth fighting.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: They ought to go spend time, like you and I have, Martha. You know what's been happening in Iraq. You've been there as much as anybody. There has, in fact, been fundamental change and transformation, and improvement for the better. I think even you would admit that.

Q: Let me go back to the Americans. Two-thirds of Americans say it's not worth fighting, and they're looking at the value gain versus the cost in American lives, certainly, and Iraqi lives.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: So?

Q: So -- you don't care what the American people think?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: No, I think you cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the public opinion polls. Think about what would have happened if Abraham Lincoln had paid attention to polls, if they had had polls during the Civil War. He never would have succeeded if he hadn't had a clear objective, a vision for where he wanted to go, and he was willing to withstand the slings and arrows of the political wars in order to get there. And this President has been very courageous, very consistent, very determined to continue down the course we were on and to achieve our objective. And that's victory in Iraq, that's the establishment of a democracy where there's never been a democracy, it's the establishment of a regime that respects the rights and liberties of their people, as an ally for the United States in the war against terror, and as a positive force for change in the Middle East. That's a huge accomplishment.
Pulled from the White House's transcript because ABC had split the quote across two pages.


Out of context? A little, yes. Misrepresented? Hell no! Dick Cheney still comes across as an asshole. He should be cheneyed for the smirk, alone. He was, however, polite about it.

And this is what got to me. Moore said Cheney, "cut her off," remember. He didn't. In fact, Raddatz cut him off a moment before. Think Progress wasn't thinking, either. Their transcript implies the aired segment was continuous when clearly it wasn't.

Shit stinks all on its own. No effort is required to make it repugnant. Yet, they - ABC, Think Progress, and Michael Moore - all seem to have taken that extra, needless step.

ABC can be forgiven. They're just trying to keep you hooked so they can sell commercials. Think Progress could just be the reactionaries the Right paint them as. Maybe they can't help it.

Michael Moore, though? How many films has he made? Granted, he doesn't edit his movies but knows how films are made and put together. He knows better. He knew what he was doing. Now you do.

His letter is dated 5 days after the March 19th interview and 'though it's likely a coincidence, he sent it out the same day that Cheney gave a follow up interview to Radditz that ended with him asking us to believe that he's not that big of an asshole.

Like trying to shine shit.

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Star Trek: Aaaaarrrrrrggghhh

Again, no. Aaaaarrrrrrggghhh is not the title of the new Star Trek flick, either. It's the stupid way I've chosen to pronounce the Alternate Reality Game being used to promote it.

For the moment, you'll have to find the door yourself. Go to www . Star Trek Movie . com, wait for the red dot and click it. I'll share more after a bit more thought.

In the mean time, do bask in the glory of my triumph.

Supposedly, it's a corridor from the re-envisioned Enterprise.

I am not nearly the first to snag the image, but I dare say mine is by far the largest.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Star Trek XI: The Sickening

No, that's not the name of the new Star Trek flick due out May 8th, 2009. The Sickening will by my expounding on it for the next 13 months.

I've just signed up to shill for Paramount, getting access to the noodly bits before the masses do. But since I, myself, avoid plot detail like the plague, 1) you will not learn more plot than you wanted to know, and 2) you will learn more production info than you ever wanted to know.

Further, as some film trailers reveal WAY too much, I may skip many of those, too. The YouTubed trailer below is safe to view, however. Here's the full list of available trailer formats and sizes.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Halo 3 vs. The Blendtec Total Blender



It was an unfair fight really, the Blendtec Total Blender costs five times as much.

See Blendtec's other victims at: www.WillItBlend.com

Plasma Weapons of Your Very Own



It was bound to happen sooner or later.

Waste your money at ThinkGeek.com.

Should we be concerned for you, Patrick Kelly?

What to do? What to do?

I've recently signed up to be an editor at UrbanDictionary.com. Basically, I vote or reject new definitions before anyone else can see them. It's pretty fun and any schmoe can do it.

Anywho, I come across this entry ...
patrick kelly:

A human who is not that pathetic as it seems, he is just trying to be left alone, but these idiots keep messing with him, it just isn't fair, leave him alone or you will get hurt, that i promise as patrick myself....

"leave me alone, dont mess with me i just want to be left alone!"
I rejected it, but this reads like one of those warnings people say they wish they'd paid attention to before tragedy hit.

As I understand UrbanDictionary.com's editing rules non-famous people should not be published there. But, just in case, hopefully foolishly, I thought I should publish it here.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

New Heights In Halo

Give a geek enough caffeine and there ain't no place in Halo he can't get to.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Halo 3: Fun With Gravity

Offing your buddies ain't the only fun to be had with Halo.



And, yeah, I guess I discovered a use for YouTube.

Friday, March 07, 2008

How Many Star Trek's We Got Around Here, Anyhow?!

Eleven.



Pay no attention to the date at the end of this clip. The trailer on the official site says it's coming out Summer of 2009.

Take your time, boys. Remember how rushing Nemesis earned you the lowest US Gross of any Star Trek film. Take your time.

No well ever dries up. Just as true, however, no drink from any well is ever garaunteed not to have a turd in it.

Spaceballs: TAS

I supported the Writers Guild strike wholeheartedly, but am saddended to find that one of the casualties is Spaceballs: The Animated Series.

It was supposed to air on G4 TV. You can only find it's page using their search feature and the Coming Soon promo is still all they have up.

Thankfully, one aired-promo was captured and got posted on YouTube.



I choose to hope that it will still come out, because, while nearly all such ventures suck tremendously, having Mel Brooks producing, performing and even writing some of the material, absolutely would have made it worthy of our love.

I Am Officially Not Stupid

The Internet, of course, is rife with people trying to get to know you. Whether they're trying to market junk to you, steal from you or stalk you is irrelevant. You must keep aware at all times.

I had always skipped Internet questionnaires before, but found one called, "Are You Stupid" to see what level of questions they were asking. It was actually a decent set of questions, touching upon math, science, history, geography, plus pop culture.

They included such gems as: "What is the world's capital?", "Do you know what sex or gender you are?" and "Complete the following phrase: Luke, I am your _______." (Local Congressman was option C)

Number 15 was my a-ha moment. "Do you know when your birthday is?" with three boxes in YYYY/MM/DD format. This was actually their second attempted swipe of my identity. They got the first piece when I identified my gender. Had I also given them my birthdate and later my zip code, they would have more than enough information to start impersonating me.

Out of 20 questions, those were the only two I answered, well ... differently. There's no way for them to verify their correctness. In order to get to the results, however, I had to input my home address. Yah, right! I told them to send pic-a-nic baskets to Yogi Bear, at 22 Forest Rd., Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.

And then finally: the results page.
82.5%
Smarty Pants!

Congratulations! You are not stupid. We dub thee, "Smarty Pants" ....

That is why I am not stupid. The couldn't trick me into giving away my personal information!

Despite their questionable math skills (18 of 20 equals 82.5 percent?), they, I learned, are not stupid either. I lost the initial results sifting through my browser history to get the wordings right, forcing me to retake the questionaire. This time, though, it checked my phony information against databases of real information.

It knew I wasn't 108 years, 3 months, and 7 days old. After getting locked into the 90210 zip code (that show's graphic was just to the side), a fake street number on a real Beverly Hills street didn't work. I couldn't find any local RNC offices spam, so I guess I have to apologize to Beverly Hill High School if they are suddenly inundated by contact lens adverts.

Wrapping things up, paranoia is decidely healthy when it comes to your personal information. Identifying something as simple as U.S. Representative pins down where you live nearly as well as your zip code. When someone, anyone, asks you a question, make sure you know who you're talking to and why they're asking. Paranoid? You betcha.

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Lost Another Occupation to India

Surrogate Mothers.

Foreign couples turn to India for surrogate mothers
By Amelia Gentleman
Published: March 4, 2008

Wow. I'm impressed. This is a new moral low that I wasn't expecting. My objection is based purely on the issue of exploitation, but the Religious Right had better get mobilized right quick. The Israeli couple in the article are both men. Further, while Israel legalized same-sex adoption February, 2008, the same is not true of same-sex surrogacy.

India's gotta have an out-of-date, bigoted law that Mitt Romney can exploit.

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

The Hardships of a Lowly Little Blog

My blog was MIA for the past 24 hours. In trying to add some extra features from Google I broke some key under workings of either my domain (CK.c) or how Google handles my domain. Either way it's fixed.

Google's wizard was good when it worked, but when something broke it was uselessly oblivious. Like most wizards it shielded the user from the harsh realities of DNS doodling. Which is fine when the wizard works, but crippling when it doesn't. The solution was found far from the source of the problem.

The endeavor that caused this mess is the creation of some static pages to accompany my blog. MMM. Colonel Kernel .COM

It seems there are loads of other Google Apps users with nearly the identical issue. After I prose my solution I may post it here.